DD_DBAL_CONST_CHK - Text table for consistency check messages
The following messages are stored in message class DD_DBAL_CONST_CHK: Text table for consistency check messages.
It is part of development package SD_DBAL_CONSISTENCY in software component BC-DWB-DIC. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "Consistency checks in DBAL".
It is part of development package SD_DBAL_CONSISTENCY in software component BC-DWB-DIC. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "Consistency checks in DBAL".
Message Nr ▲ | Message Text |
---|---|
001 | Checking artefact &1 of &2: |
002 | Name: &1, Type: &2 |
003 | &1 is consistent |
004 | DB artefact not exists |
005 | DD definition not exists |
100 | &1 is not consistent |
101 | Field at position &1 not consistent |
102 | Field does not exist on DB |
103 | Field does not exist in RTOBJ |
104 | Fieldname inconsistent |
105 | Field position not consistent |
106 | Tabname not consistent |
107 | Viewfield not consistent |
108 | Viewname not consistent |
109 | Viewfield on DB not consistent |
110 | Table name in view definition is inconsistent |
111 | BG mapping of DB table name is inconsistent |
112 | BG mapping of projection view is inconsistent |
113 | &1-field &2 does not exist in view definiton |
114 | &1-field &3 does not exist in &2 |
115 | BG mapping of &1-field &2 to view definition is inconsistent |
116 | BG mapping of &1-field &2 is not consistent |
117 | View Text mapping of &1-field &2 is not consistent |
120 | Field &1 not exists on DB |
121 | Field &1 not exists in RTOBJ |
122 | Length of field &1 is not consistent |
123 | Decimals of field &1 is not consistent |
124 | Nullability of field &1 is not consistent |
125 | Position of field &1 is not consistent |
126 | Type of field &1 is not consistent |
130 | Load unit is inconsistent |
131 | Storage type is inconsistent |
132 | Primary Key Type is inconsistent |
140 | Index &1&2 not exists on DB |
141 | Index &1&2 not exists in RTOBJ |
142 | Primary flag of index &1&2 is not consistent |
143 | Unique flag of index &1&2 is not consistent |
144 | Field &1 of index &2&3 not exists on DB |
145 | Field &1 of index &2&3 not exists in RTOBJ |
146 | Fulltext index specification of index &1&2 is inconsistent. |
147 | Index &1&2 only exists on DB |
148 | Index &1&2 is not defined in DDIC |
149 | Index &1&2 does not exist on DB |
150 | Basetable &1 is not consistent |
151 | Basetable &1 does not exist on DB |
152 | Basetable &1 does not exist in RTOBJ |
153 | DD language is not consistent |
154 | Viewname ist not consistent |
155 | Tablename ist not consistent |
156 | Position is not consistent |
160 | Join at primary position &1 is not consistent |
161 | Join at primary position &1 does not exist on DB |
162 | Join at primary position &1 does not exist in RTOBJ |
163 | Tablename is not consistent |
164 | Fieldname is not consistent |
165 | Forkey is not consistent |
166 | Fortable is not consistent |
167 | Checktable is not consistent |
168 | Checkfield is not consistent |
169 | Primary position is not consistent |
170 | Domname is not consistent |
171 | Datatype is not consistent |
172 | Length is not consistent |
173 | Forstring is not consistent |
180 | Condition &1 is not consistent |
181 | Condition &1 does not exist on DB |
182 | Condition &1 does not exist on RTOBJ |
183 | And/Or is not consistent |
184 | Condition name is not consistent |
185 | Constants is not consistent |
186 | DD language is not consistent |
187 | Fieldname is not consistent |
188 | Joperator is not consistent |
189 | Jsource is not consistent |
190 | Negation is not consistent |
191 | Position is not consistent |
192 | Tablename is not consistent |
193 | Operator is not consistent |
200 | &1 Inconsistency: CREATE Statements are not consistent |
201 | Index &1&2 unknown in Runtime Object |