IPPECIF - Nachrichten der APO-CIF-Schnittstelle des iPPE
The following messages are stored in message class IPPECIF: Nachrichten der APO-CIF-Schnittstelle des iPPE.
It is part of development package CPPECIF in software component LO-MD-PPE. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "APO-CIF Interface for iPPE".
It is part of development package CPPECIF in software component LO-MD-PPE. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "APO-CIF Interface for iPPE".
Message Nr ▲ | Message Text |
|---|---|
| 000 | iPPE change pointers could not be read |
| 001 | No change pointers found for iPPE data |
| 002 | iPPE: &1 filter objects of type &2 automatically transferred |
| 003 | iPPE: Error selecting dependent filter objects |
| 004 | iPPE: Selection error |
| 005 | iPPE: &1 filter objects, type SA, have been automatically included |
| 006 | Error while transferring iPPE data into the system &1 |
| 007 | Error transferring dependent data in the system &1 |
| 008 | Errors occured during the explosion in &1 |
| 009 | Reference to &1 &2 will not be transferred |
| 010 | Resource node &1 could not be read |
| 011 | Mode &1 not completely transferred to the APO |
| 012 | Material &1 does not exist |
| 013 | Data could not be converted to APO structures |
| 014 | Relationship type not supported in Standard APO 3.0 |
| 015 | Could not find a unit for dimension &1 |
| 016 | &1 change pointers were set to status 'processed' |
| 017 | Error while transferring iPPE data into the system &1 |
| 018 | No active IM for material &1, plant &2, production version &3 |
| 019 | Error during quantification |
| 020 | Error while opening error list |
| 021 | Error while reading data |
| 022 | Deletion of production version &1 in SCM is not possible |
| 023 | All production versions with deletion indicator are deleted |
| 024 | No production version marked for deletion found |
| 098 | Transaction PPECIF01 is no longer valid |
| 099 | *********** Comparis. Tool ********************************************** |
| 100 | Object exists only in SAP ERP |
| 101 | Object exists only in SAP SCM |
| 102 | Detailed data for the object is different in the two systems |
| 103 | Deletion indicator is set for the object |
| 104 | Indicator for required component is set differently |
| 105 | Indicator for multiple selection is set differently |
| 106 | Logical systems for the object are not the same |
| 107 | Material number is not the same |
| 108 | Material version is not the same |
| 109 | A row of the object dependency differs |
| 110 | Value for a characteristic in the variant configuration is different |
| 111 | Color supplement key for the color node differs |
| 112 | Different change numbers are assigned to the object |
| 113 | Variant differentiation differs for the color node |
| 114 | Quantity differs for the component variant |
| 115 | Size differs for the component variant |
| 116 | Percentage differs for the size |
| 117 | Variable-size item quantity differs for the component variant |
| 118 | Formula differs for calculating the variable-size item |
| 119 | There is a new short text |
| 120 | Object dependency only exists in the ERP system |
| 121 | Object dependency exists in the SAP APO system only |
| 122 | Row of the object dependency only exists ERP system |
| 123 | Row of the object dependency exists only in the SAP APO system |
| 124 | Configuration for the component variant only exists ERP system |
| 125 | Configuration for the component variant exists only in the SAP APO system |
| 126 | Variant differentiation for the component variant is only in ERP system |
| 127 | Variant differentiation for the component variant is only in APO system |
| 128 | Different process structure is assigned to the production version |
| 129 | Different access node is assigned to the production version |
| 130 | Different component variant is assigned to the production version |
| 131 | Different line structure is assigned to the production version |
| 132 | Object assigned to the production version has a different object type |
| 133 | Supply area is assigned to the activity node only in the ERP system |
| 134 | Supply area is assigned to the activity node only in the SAP APO system |
| 135 | Supply area is assigned to different modes |
| 136 | Assignment differs (supply area/reporting point) |
| 137 | Resource assigned to the mode exists only in the ERP system |
| 138 | Resource assigned to the mode exists only in the SAP APO system |
| 139 | Line node has a reporting point in the ERP system only |
| 140 | Line node has a reporting point in the SAP APO system only |
| 141 | Line balance has a different effectivity in ERP to that in the APO system |
| 142 | Line balance has a different effectivity in APO to that in the ERP system |
| 143 | Model mix planning differs for the line balance |
| 144 | Resource assignment differs |
| 145 | Model mix item exists in the SAP ERP system only |
| 146 | Model mix item exists in the SAP APO system only |
| 147 | Line balance relationship exists in the SAP ERP system only |
| 148 | Line balance relationship exists in the SAP APO system only |
| 149 | Supply area assignment differs |
| 150 | Plant and material for the MMP item belong to different access nodes |
| 151 | There is a new long text in this language in the SAP ERP system |
| 152 | There is a new long text in the SAP APO system in this language |
| 153 | Long text differs |
| 154 | Customer exit differs for the object |
| 155 | RFC connection to logical system does not exist |
| 156 | Object &1 &3 of object type &2 exists only in the SAP ERP system |
| 157 | Object &1 &3 of object type &2 exists only in the SAP APO system |
| 158 | Object &1 of object type &2 is different in the two systems |
| 159 | The following differences have been found: |
| 160 | * &1 &2 &3 &4 |
| 161 | Data will be saved under the log number &1 |
| 162 | Logical system &1 cannot be opened |
| 163 | Object &1 of type &2 has not been found |
| 164 | There is no message maintained for the &1 field |
| 165 | Internal error has occurred in &1 |
| 166 | Change state exists only in the SAP R/3 system |
| 167 | Change status exists only in the SAP APO system |
| 168 | Duration of the mode differs |
| 169 | Number of production resources differs |
| 170 | Name of the object differs |
| 171 | Class assigned to the object differs |
| 172 | Class type of the class assigned to the object differs |
| 173 | Assignment to an assembly template differs |
| 174 | Setting for the 'Standard Variant' indicator differs |
| 175 | Priority of the object dependency differs |
| 176 | Object has a different type |
| 177 | Assignment of variant and node differs |
| 178 | Configuration value differs |
| 179 | Assignment to function group CMP differs |
| 180 | Unit of measure differs |
| 181 | Object is assigned to different locations |
| 182 | Fixed duration differs |
| 183 | Duration of the short break for the activity is different |
| 184 | Time unit differs for the short break |
| 185 | Reporting point for the activity differs in the two systems |
| 186 | Relationship is different in the two systems |
| 187 | Assignment between alternative/line balance and node is incorrect |
| 188 | Standard processing path differs for multiple work centers |
| 189 | Number of takts differs for a line/line segment |
| 190 | Name of the resource differs |
| 191 | Minimum retention period in a buffer differs |
| 192 | Maximum retention period in a buffer differs |
| 193 | Time unit for the retention period differs |
| 194 | Settings for the 'Takted Prod. Lot Size 1' indicator differ |
| 195 | Settings differ for the 'Planning Segment' indicator |
| 196 | Setting differs for ind. 'Do not consider line balances in explosion' |
| 197 | Average retention period in a buffer differs |
| 198 | Time unit is different for the average retention period |
| 199 | Priority of lines in part of line networks is different |
| 200 | Position of a reporting point differs |
| 201 | Reporting point type differs for a reporting point |
| 202 | Quantity differs in the line balance rate |
| 203 | Time differs for the line balance rate |
| 204 | Time unit differs for the line balance rate |
| 205 | Absolute share of the material differs in the model mix |
| 206 | Sequence of activities in the line balance differs |
| 207 | Calendar assignment differs |
| 208 | Time zone assignment differs |
| 209 | Type of operating facility differs |
| 210 | Setting differs for the 'Capacity Planning Allowed' indicator |
| 211 | Dimension of available capacity at multi-activity resources differs |
| 212 | Characteristic only exists in the SAP ERP system |
| 213 | The characteristic only exists in the SAP APO System. |
| 214 | Change state of the scheme only exists in the SAP ERP system |
| 215 | The change status of the scheme only exists in the SAP APO System. |
| 216 | No active integration model was found. |
| 217 | Log GUID could not be created |
| 218 | Please enter a new log name. |
| 219 | The block size for selecting iPPE data has not been defined |
| 220 | The change pointer for line balance &1 is not processed |
| 221 | Log &1 &2 &3 &4 was deleted |
| 222 | Choose another logical system than the current system. |
| 300 | iPPE production version &1/&2 was deleted in system &3 |
| 301 | Production version &1/&2 was deleted from integration models |
| 302 | Select several variants |
| 500 | **************** Adjust. Tool ****************************************** |
| 501 | Release to APO System &1 could not be determined. |
| 502 | APO Release &1 is not supported. |
| 503 | The adjustment was canceled. |
| 504 | *-----------------------------------------------------------------------* |
| 505 | Data are being read in &1: |
| 506 | Data are being processed in &1: |
| 507 | Data are being formatted in &1: |
| 508 | The adjusment could not be fully executed. |
| 509 | The connection to &1 could not be created. |
| 510 | The production version &1 / &2 / &3 was not found. |
| 511 | Deletion was canceled |
| 512 | Selected iPPE object &1 does not exist in ERP system |
| 513 | Selected iPPE object &1 could not be read |