RSODP - Operational Data Provider: Messages
The following messages are stored in message class RSODP: Operational Data Provider: Messages.
It is part of development package RSODP in software component BW-WHM-DST. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "Operational Data Provisioning (BW Part)".
It is part of development package RSODP in software component BW-WHM-DST. This development package consists of objects that can be grouped under "Operational Data Provisioning (BW Part)".
Message Nr ▲ | Message Text |
---|---|
000 | Replication for InfoProvider &1 |
001 | InfoSet extraction completed (&1 records read) |
002 | Could not extract InfoSet |
003 | TREX Indexing Started |
004 | TREX Indexing Completed |
005 | TREX Indexing Failed |
006 | Copying to Enhanced TREX Structure Started |
007 | Copying to Enhanced TREX Structure Completed |
008 | Error during TREX Indexing |
009 | TREX Access for Operational Data Provider &1 Deactivated |
010 | TREX Indices for Operational Data Provider &1 Deleted |
011 | Create BWA index for operational data provider &1 (&2) |
012 | BWA index created for operational data provider &1 (&2) |
013 | Error creating BWA index for operational data provider &1 (&2) |
014 | Waiting for Separated Processes |
015 | Error Splitting Parallel Processes |
016 | Termination Due to Errors in a Parallel Process |
017 | Replication for InfoProvider &1 completed |
018 | TREX error &1: &2 &3 &4 |
019 | Loading in delta modus requires partition selection |
020 | Parallel Processes Split Under Job Name &1 |
021 | This change to the selections requires a rebuild of all partitions |
022 | Selected dataset is already in the BIA |
023 | Error in lock server |
024 | Indexing for InfoProvider &1 is running |
025 | Error with Commit &1 |
026 | Commit successful |
027 | Shared lock could not be assigned |
028 | Rollback |
029 | Rollback failed |
030 | Rollback possible |
031 | Rebuild of index required |
032 | BIA destination not maintained |
033 | Error while creating authorization index |
034 | Created logical TREX index &1 |
035 | Query does not contain any characteristics or key figures |
036 | Minimum TREX version for ODP: 7.20.02 |
037 | Maximum number of nodes (&1) reached |
038 | Attribute &2 does not exist in TREX index &1 |
039 | Error while creating BObj. Explorer Index for ODP &1 (&2) |
040 | &1 &2 &3 &4 |
041 | Minimum TREX version for join ODPs is 7.2x.11 |
042 | ODP &1 (&2) reads data from the BWA |
043 | ODP &1 activated |
044 | ODP &1 deleted |
045 | |
046 | -- Messages related to ODP &1 |
047 | Continue without preview of transient provider (long text) |
048 | ODP &1 does not exist |
049 | Association of type &1 for field &2 expected but not found |
050 | Association to OPD &2 is missing for field &1 |
051 | Definition of ODP &1 is not correct |
052 | A key field must have the InfoObject name &1 |
053 | Characteristic &1 is used as a key in ODP &2 and ODP &3 |
054 | Missing associations in hierarchy element &1 |
055 | No fields with text semantics |
056 | Cannot derive InfoObject name for field &1 |
057 | Field &1 must have a local InfoObject name |
058 | Hierarchy ODP &3 does not allow value &1 in field &2 |
059 | Intervals are not supported in hierarchies |
060 | InfoObject name &1 is not required for field &2 and &3 |
061 | Field &1 in join of association between ODP &2 and ODP &3 is not in ODP |
062 | Basic chars. for fields &1 (ODP &4) and field &2 (ODP &3) do not match |
063 | Total length of the key fields (&1) is longer than 60 characters |
064 | Association &1 for field &2 ignored. Field &3 is ignored in view &4. |
065 | Association between &1 and &2 ignored. Field &3 not allowed in join |
066 | Field &1 (ODP &2) must be mapped to field &3 |
067 | ODP contains fields with compulsory selection |
068 | InfoProvider &1 does not exist because ODP &2 is not available |
069 | Dependency analysis is not possible for InfoProvider &1 |
070 | ODP &1(&2) contains a further field (&3) in the transport version |
071 | ODP &1(&2) is not compatible with transport version |
072 | Field &1 (ODP &2) has to have an association to InfoObject &3 |
073 | Field &1 (ODP &2): InfoObject &3 of the association does not exist |
074 | Field &1 (ODP &2): InfoObject &3 of the assc. has to be a basic char. |
075 | Field &1 (ODP &2): Join definition violates compounding of &3 |
076 | Representative key field &1 cannot be mapped to an InfoObject |
077 | Field &1 of DDL view &2 does not support hierarchies |
078 | ODP &1 is a projection of ODP &2 |
079 | Hierarchy &1 not found for DDL view &2 |
080 | CDS View &1 not found or it is not a correctly defined analytic view |
081 | FROM clause in DDL view &1 is not a CDS view of category CUBE |
082 | Hierarchy key field &1 not specified |
083 | Error in association &1 from &2 to &3: Field &4 not key in target |
084 | Association &1: Field &2 (&3) does not map to representative key &4 |
085 | Field &1 ignored: It requires a field with semantics &2 |
086 | Field &1 ignored: Type &2 with length &3 not supported |
087 | Field &1 ignored: Compounding too complex |
088 | Field &1: Association to &2 can't be interpreted and will be ignored |
089 | Error in &1 from &2 to &3: Field &4 does not map to InfoObject |
090 | Association &1: Field &2 not mapped to InfoObject in target &3 |
091 | Association &1: Field &2 in target &3 has to be part of the join |
092 | Association &1: Field &2 must be at position &3 in the join |
093 | Association &1: Field &2 is not allowed in the join |
094 | Error in hierarchy view &1. View will be ignored. |
095 | Field &1: Data type &2 not allowed for time stamp semantic |
096 | Field &1 (ODP &2): unspecific problem - check semantic of the field |
097 | Field &1: Cannot find original CDS name (CamelCase) |
098 | Error in hierarchy view &1: Association to &2 used multiple times. |
099 | System is not configured correctly - see note 2289865 |
100 | Value help view &1 ignored: Field &2 is not a key field |
101 | Logical conjunction ANALYTICSFILTER not supported in ESH ODP on SAP HANA |
102 | Empty join conditions are not supported in ESH ODP on SAP HANA |
103 | Field &1 ignored: Data type &2 not allowed for characteristic |
104 | Field &1 ignored: Data type &2 not allowed for measures |
105 | Characteristic &1 not allowed in value help |
106 | Field &1 in &2 with ALPHA is associated to &3 in &4 with different length |
107 | DB hint "&1" will be ignored in Analytics |
108 | View is inconsistent since one of the associated views is inconsistent |
109 | CHAR or SSTR field &1 in &2 is associated to &3 in &4 with shorter length |
110 | SpatialData feature ignored, there is more than one field |
111 | CDS Geo Data returned as GEOJSON and with Spatial Reference System 3857 |
112 | Field &1: Data type &2 has length &3 greater than max. Chavl length (250) |
113 | &1 is associated with &2 but with different data type, length or convexit |
114 | Field &1 with conversion exit '&3' is associated to field &2 with '&4' |
115 | Association &1 in &2 ignored |
116 | Fields &1 and &2 need same target of their foreign key associations |
117 | Error in determining the associations of ODP &1; all associations ignored |
118 | Chaconst field &1 of type &2 in View &3 not supported |
119 | Text semantic of key field &1 ignored |
120 | Association of field &1 ignored: Target view &2 is inconsistent |
121 | Association of field &1 ignored: Association for field &2 is inconsistent |
122 | Annotation &1 ignored: Class &2 doesn't exist |
123 | Annotation &1 ignored: Class &2 has to implement interface &3 |
124 | Field in CDS view not found for the corresponding InfoObject &1 |
125 | Field &1 in association &2 mapped to field with incompatible type |
126 | Field &1 in association &2 is shorter than the mapped field |
127 | Annotation &1 ignored: Class &2 has a syntax error |
128 | Field &1 in assocation &2 not allowed. Hier. structure not timedpendent |
129 | Association of field &1 ignored: Semantics for field &2 are inconsistent |
133 | Field &1 in View &2 has date semantics. Cannot be used in the Assoc. &3 |
134 | There must be a foreign key association with target view &1 |
135 | CDS Query Designer API Simulator is relevant for ABAP CDS Context |